We stand on guard for thee-se things

 

Hollywood legend takes on the right on taxes

 

Ten questions about CETA

 

Tanker owners not responsible for spill cleanup?

 

On inequality and politics

 

This is not a story from The Onion

 

Stephen Harper’s Senate meltdown

Stephen Harper just can’t catch a break on the slow-motion disaster that has become the Senate of Canada. 

Facing a lengthy suspension (without pay), Mike Duffy’s lawyer has come forward to share details of just how knee-deep the Prime Minister’s Office was in Duffy’s affairs.

It makes sense. Duffy was appointed to the Senate to travel the country on behalf of the Conservative Party on the public’s dime. No wonder there was an entire binder of Duffy’s whereabouts in the PMO

Duffy’s never-ending scandal only distracts, fleetingly, from another one of the Senate’s enfants terribles. Pamela Wallin, another PMO problem that won’t go away, beat Duffy to the punch by dispatching her lawyer to attack the move to suspend her (without pay).

The push to suspend Duffy and Wallin, along with Patrick Brazeau, isn’t going so smoothly.

The Senate’s dirty little secret – a public institution that pays for party hacks to do partisan work – is now out.

The burn for Harper? Not all senators are playing along.

Conservative Senator Hugh Segal has already said he can’t support the motion, up for debate on Tuesday.

This isn’t the first time Segal has been a thorn in Harper’s side. Not long ago, Segal spearheaded a mini mutiny in the Senate by gutting a draconian union disclosure law. Segal is also a big booster of a guaranteed annual income to tackle poverty, and he talks it up as often as he can.

Didn’t Segal get the memo? Harper just can’t catch a break with this unelected body, best described as “a relic of the 19th century.” (h/t Harper circa 2005).

Maybe things would be different if Harper had kept his word. In 2004, Harper said he “would not name appointed people to the Senate.”After he was elected in 2006, Harper went on an appointment spree, naming 57 (so far).

Photo: urbanmixer. Used under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 2.0 licence.

Stephen Harper’s Senate meltdown

Stephen Harper just can’t catch a break on the slow-motion disaster that has become the Senate of Canada. 

Facing a lengthy suspension (without pay), Mike Duffy’s lawyer has come forward to share details of just how knee-deep the Prime Minister’s Office was in Duffy’s affairs.

It makes sense. Duffy was appointed to the Senate to travel the country on behalf of the Conservative Party on the public’s dime. No wonder there was an entire binder of Duffy’s whereabouts in the PMO

Duffy’s never-ending scandal only distracts, fleetingly, from another one of the Senate’s enfants terribles. Pamela Wallin, another PMO problem that won’t go away, beat Duffy to the punch by dispatching her lawyer to attack the move to suspend her (without pay).

The push to suspend Duffy and Wallin, along with Patrick Brazeau, isn’t going so smoothly.

The Senate’s dirty little secret – a public institution that pays for party hacks to do partisan work – is now out.

The burn for Harper? Not all senators are playing along.

Conservative Senator Hugh Segal has already said he can’t support the motion, up for debate on Tuesday.

This isn’t the first time Segal has been a thorn in Harper’s side. Not long ago, Segal spearheaded a mini mutiny in the Senate by gutting a draconian union disclosure law. Segal is also a big booster of a guaranteed annual income to tackle poverty, and he talks it up as often as he can.

Didn’t Segal get the memo? Harper just can’t catch a break with this unelected body, best described as “a relic of the 19th century.” (h/t Harper circa 2005).

Maybe things would be different if Harper had kept his word. In 2004, Harper said he “would not name appointed people to the Senate.”After he was elected in 2006, Harper went on an appointment spree, naming 57 (so far).

Photo: urbanmixer. Used under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 2.0 licence.

"It's just making sure the resource sector is well represented"

If you live in Prince George, BC, you would have opened your local paper on Friday to read about the newly minted chair of the BC and Yukon Conservative caucus.

Or, rather, local MP Bob Zimmer’s take on his job: to report the views of regional MPs to Stephen Harper and the rest of the Conservative cabinet. And what would those views be?

"It's neat to be that voice," Zimmer told The Prince George Citizen. "It's just making sure the resource sector is well represented and the issues are well represented."

Interesting timing to talk about the interests of the resource sector.

This attitude may help contextualize what the citizens of Prince George – and the rest of the country – saw Thursday on the other side of the country.

The confrontation between the Elsipogtog First Nation and hundreds of RCMP officers turned ugly when police descended on Rexton, NB. The RCMP moved in to enforce a court injunction to stop a weeks-long Mi’kmaq protest aimed at blocking SWN Resources Canada from commencing shale gas exploration in the area. First Nations leaders want a public consultation before any shale gas exploration can begin. 

That seems reasonable. Fracking and shale gas exploration has been tied to serious threats to water security and public health, and First Nations need to be at the table – in BC, in Rexton, and elsewhere.

As a start, the chair of the BC and Yukon Conservative caucus may want to check out this video from Rexton: 

//www.youtube.com/embed/F2y2z6fdf5Q


Photo: kheelcenter. Used under a Creative Commons BY licence.

David Suzuki explains extreme weather